The Evolving Role Of The Scrum Master: From Rule-Keeper To Waste-Remover
- Steven Granese

- Apr 7
- 3 min read
Updated: Sep 26

Scrum Master Is A Role, Not A Job Title
There is confusion between the Scrum Master role (aka accountability) and the Scrum Master job title. This confusion creates unnecessary expectations and awkward staffing decisions. On many teams, someone must play the role of Scrum Master, but that does not mean a company should hire someone whose only job is to be a Scrum Master. If a team needs 5-10 hours of Scrum facilitation per week, do they really want a full-time person filling up the rest of their time with random tasks? That leads to a bad pattern: assigning one Scrum Master to multiple teams. Sharing a Scrum Master across teams creates dependencies and breaks the connection between the Scrum Master and the day-to-day work of a single team. Instead, I suggest asking: who on the team can own the Scrum Master role?
Removing Waste Over Enforcing Rules
The traditional understanding of the Scrum Master has been too narrow. Some organizations still treat Scrum Masters like junior project managers, checking whether the events are happening and updating Jira tickets. But the more helpful view is to treat the Scrum Master as the person who removes waste and improves efficiency. That includes supporting Scrum, surfacing blockers, reducing rework, and eliminating bureaucracy. If the team is forced to sit through pointless meetings every week, the Scrum Master should not take that personally and try to eliminate it. The Scrum Master is uniquely positioned to eliminate anything that gets in the team's way of building a great product.
Taking Action Over Escalating Problems
Agile organizations don't need more middle management. They need people who take action. Scrum Masters should not only identify problems but should feel empowered to fix them. Empowerment means talking to other teams, working with leaders, and challenging the status quo. I've seen Scrum Masters spark real change when they stop acting like messengers and start acting like problem solvers. Of course, not every obstacle can be removed by one person. But when teams know that their Scrum Master is fighting for them, trust grows. That's when process improvement stops being a theory and starts being real.
Connected To Organizational Leadership
Most Scrum Masters don't have the access or influence to fix cross-team waste. That's why many organizations need a leadership role focused on eliminating waste, such as a Director of Efficiency or a Vice President of Operations. Someone who sees the waste across teams and works to eliminate it. This person could be considered an Organizational Scrum Master (OSM). They coordinate with team-level Scrum Masters. They track patterns. They remove enterprise blockers. For example, if multiple teams are wasting time each week on a manual timecard, this person has the authority to streamline or eliminate the process. That's real value.
Counterpart To Product Owners
On a Scrum team, the Product Owner owns value. They guide what gets built and why. The Scrum Master owns efficiency. They support the team with how work gets done and what gets in their way. This division is useful. One role looks outward to customers. The other looks inward to the system. Both are essential. Yet too often, only the Product Owner role is taken seriously. It's time to recognize that Scrum Masters, when empowered, save real money and lots of time. That's not a soft skill. That is operational excellence.
Scrum Masters Deserve A Seat At The Table
If we want leaner, faster, more focused teams, we cannot ignore waste. We can't keep overloading teams with compliance work and unnecessary meetings. And we can't keep assigning one Scrum Master to many teams and hoping it works. Instead, let's give the role the focus it deserves. Let someone on each team own the Scrum Master role. Let organizational leaders treat that network of Scrum Masters as an engine of efficiency. And let's finally challenge the myth that the Scrum Master is a glorified meeting facilitator. They're more than that. They always have been.





